WebNov 21, 2024 · (i) When there is no clerk of the court, a judge or justice of the court may issue a subpoena. (ii) A judge, a justice, or an authorized officer presiding over an administrative or out-of-court proceeding may issue a subpoena to appear and testify in that proceeding. (4)Who may serve. WebOct 15, 2012 · Typically, under applicable state or federal rules of civil procedure, responses to interrogatories, requests for production, requests for admissions and requests for examination of the person must be responded to within 30 days of service (add additional days if mailed or emailed). 8See Fed. R. Civ. P. 33 (Interrogatories); Fed. R. Civ. P. 34 …
Rule 8.25 - MOTION UNDER ORCP 71 FOR RELIEF FROM …
WebMar 11, 2024 · (1) In any action or other proceeding subject to a fee under ORS 21.135 (Standard filing fee), 21.145 (Simple proceeding filing fee) or 21.160 (Filing fee for tort and contract actions), a $111 fee must be paid by the party filing one of the following motions and by the party responding to the motion: (a) http://www.counciloncourtprocedures.org/Content/2015-2024%20Biennium/2015-09-12%20minutes%20with%20appendices.pdf church heathen shaggy official video
Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Defendant-Appellant.
WebIn that case, unless an alternate juror, seated under Rule 57 F, is available to replace the discharged juror or unless the parties agree to proceed with the remaining jurors, a new juror may be sworn, and the trial begin anew; or the jury may be discharged, and a new jury then or afterwards formed. E Failure to appear for trial. WebNov 21, 2024 · As amended through November 21, 2024. Rule 1.35 - FILING AND SERVICE. (1) Filing. (a) Filing Defined: Delivery, Receipt, and Acceptance. (i) A person intending to file a document in the appellate court must cause the document to be delivered to the Appellate Court Administrator. (ii) Delivery may be made as follows and otherwise as provided ... WebMay 3, 1990 · In decisions dating back to the turn of the century, this court, applying statutes with provisions similar to those of ORCP 57 D(1)(g), consistently has confirmed that (1) it does not review de novo a trial court's ruling on a challenge based on actual bias, and (2) it accords great weight to a trial court's finding of fact whether a ... devil may cry peak of combat website